<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes From Underground: Schaeuble Proves Why 2+2=5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yragharris.com/2012/07/25/schaeuble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yragharris.com/2012/07/25/schaeuble/</link>
	<description>Where 2+2=5 is also a beautiful thing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yra harris</title>
		<link>http://yragharris.com/2012/07/25/schaeuble/#comment-6859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yra harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yrah53.wordpress.com/?p=1567#comment-6859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Danny--I don&#039;t think the FED is planning on any move on Wednesday except a chance of extending the language for FED zero out to 2015.Why would Bernanke succumb to the idiotic remarks of Chuckie Schumer --you are the only game in town---Bernanke believes that a QE3 at this time would let the clowns off the hook on the Fiscal Cliff---as I will blog about tonight,it is more of passing interest that Geithner is heading to Europe tonight foe meetings with Schaeuble and Draghi in Germany.This may be important as if Draghi pressures Geithner it may mean that Obama will offer to get serious on the Fiscal Cliff and show leadership going into the election---let&#039;s pay close attention]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny&#8211;I don&#8217;t think the FED is planning on any move on Wednesday except a chance of extending the language for FED zero out to 2015.Why would Bernanke succumb to the idiotic remarks of Chuckie Schumer &#8211;you are the only game in town&#8212;Bernanke believes that a QE3 at this time would let the clowns off the hook on the Fiscal Cliff&#8212;as I will blog about tonight,it is more of passing interest that Geithner is heading to Europe tonight foe meetings with Schaeuble and Draghi in Germany.This may be important as if Draghi pressures Geithner it may mean that Obama will offer to get serious on the Fiscal Cliff and show leadership going into the election&#8212;let&#8217;s pay close attention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://yragharris.com/2012/07/25/schaeuble/#comment-6835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yrah53.wordpress.com/?p=1567#comment-6835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yra, 

What are the prospect for QE3 in the immediate term?  My thinking may be flawed but it goes as follows:  

(1) The Fed prefers to remain politically neutral (especially in an extremely partisan election year) thus there must be overwhelming evidence  that QE3 is needed AND a consensus that QE3 can mitigate the current headwinds i.e. outweigh negative unintended consequences --&gt; the Fed will wait.

(2) If congress fails to effectively prevent the fiscal cliff from taking a serious negative toll on the economy, the effectiveness of QE3 will be substantially mitigated which potentially destroys the cost benefit analysis in the first place --&gt; the Fed will wait.

(3) The worse the economy gets the more effective monetary stimulus becomes - thus IF congress decides to let us jump off the fiscal cliff...QE3 will provide much more benefit ONCE the negative impacts of the fiscal cliff are well underway--&gt; the Fed will wait.

What am I missing?  I just don&#039;t see how the Fed could act on QE3 now, with an irrational and incompetent congress at the helm.  Acting now would surely yield QE3 impotent AND make the monetary policy ammo box get that much more thin IF this congress can&#039;t get their act together.  Plus, and I could be wrong, it seems like monetary stimulus is more likely to have a positive impact on the economy when it is not wasted mitigating incremental economic deterioration brought about by NEW bad policy errors.  

If you agree with the gist of my logic...do you think the market is setting itself up for a let down if the Fed doesn&#039;t act now?  

Thanks for your time.

Danny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yra, </p>
<p>What are the prospect for QE3 in the immediate term?  My thinking may be flawed but it goes as follows:  </p>
<p>(1) The Fed prefers to remain politically neutral (especially in an extremely partisan election year) thus there must be overwhelming evidence  that QE3 is needed AND a consensus that QE3 can mitigate the current headwinds i.e. outweigh negative unintended consequences &#8211;&gt; the Fed will wait.</p>
<p>(2) If congress fails to effectively prevent the fiscal cliff from taking a serious negative toll on the economy, the effectiveness of QE3 will be substantially mitigated which potentially destroys the cost benefit analysis in the first place &#8211;&gt; the Fed will wait.</p>
<p>(3) The worse the economy gets the more effective monetary stimulus becomes &#8211; thus IF congress decides to let us jump off the fiscal cliff&#8230;QE3 will provide much more benefit ONCE the negative impacts of the fiscal cliff are well underway&#8211;&gt; the Fed will wait.</p>
<p>What am I missing?  I just don&#8217;t see how the Fed could act on QE3 now, with an irrational and incompetent congress at the helm.  Acting now would surely yield QE3 impotent AND make the monetary policy ammo box get that much more thin IF this congress can&#8217;t get their act together.  Plus, and I could be wrong, it seems like monetary stimulus is more likely to have a positive impact on the economy when it is not wasted mitigating incremental economic deterioration brought about by NEW bad policy errors.  </p>
<p>If you agree with the gist of my logic&#8230;do you think the market is setting itself up for a let down if the Fed doesn&#8217;t act now?  </p>
<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
<p>Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
